Charged with Drunk Driving?

Get your FREE Case Evaluation Now!

The TRUE cost of a DUI guilty plea

There is a huge misconception among people who have been arrested for a DUI that hiring a lawyer is too expensive and too much of a hassle. That is just not the case. Heading to court and pleading guilty to your DUI can cost you more than you think. The truth is hiring a DUI lawyer to fight your case may cost less money than the heavy fines and other expenses you will pay if you plead guilty. Here are some ways a DUI guilty plea can empty your wallet.

Transportation.  You need to get to work, right?  What if there is no bus, what if your friend or co-worker can’t take you?  Even if you only take a cab 2 days per week just to work and back, it could cost you more than $700 in cab fare.  (Assuming that you live 10 miles from work and your suspension is for six month.)  That’s more than two car payments, which you’ll still be making even while you’re not driving.

Insurance Rates. After a DUI arrest, if your car insurance doesn’t drop you, your monthly rate will raise at an average of 30%. Most DUI offenders will have to pay increased ratesfor three years, plus the fee with filing an SR-22. On average, you are most likely to pay an extra $500 per year for the next three years if you plead guilty to a DUI.  That’s an additional $1500 than what you’re already paying for insurance.  Unbelievable!

Ignition Interlocks. Ignition interlocks are becoming increasingly more popular as a penalty for those convicted of DUI. If you are required to install an IID, you need to pay for it. On average it costs about $60 to install an interlock, plus a monthly fee of about $60. If you are required to install an interlock for a year (which is a typical requirement), you will need to fork over at least $780.

Court Costs and Fees. It is important not forget those heavy fines you will need to pay if you get convicted of a DUI. Although it varies from state to state, you could pay up to $1200 in court fees if you get convicted.  Also, remember that depending on the severity of your DUI, these costs can go up exponentially.

Alcohol Education Classes. Alcohol education classes are a major requirement for anyone convicted of a DUI. Again, you’re responsible for paying the class fees. Although each state has different types of education requirements, it could cost you up to $2,000.

License Reinstatement. Even after you fulfilled your punishment and think this whole process is over, you’ll be slapped with another fine just to get your license back. This can cost you around $250.

Altogether, you’re looking at some major financial commitments.  Don’t forget that these are just averages.  In some states, these costs are nearly double!  Also, these fines are only the average minimum.  If you have any other extenuating factors with your DUI conviction, you will likely see these numbers multiply.

Hire a DUI attorney.  It’s worth the investment, and it’s cheaper than a guilty plea!  Get someone you feel comfortable with and has knowledge of the local DUI laws.  Ask questions and do your homework.  Hire a DUI attorney who can represent you and help you fight for your rights, your freedom and the privilege to keep your hard-earned money!!

Enhanced by Zemanta


Ready to get Help?

Complete our Free Case Evaluation form and a DUI Lawyer will review your case for Free!






Filed under: DUI/DWI — Tags: , , , , — admin @ 10:16 am




The Difference Between DUI and DWI in Illinois

Technically, DUI means driving under the influence of some type drug. That can mean alcohol, prescriptions, or illegal drugs. DWI means simply driving while intoxicated, and in many states, refers to the use of alcohol. The use of the terms can be interchangeable but DWI usually refers more to the severity the drug has metabolized within the offending person’s body.

In Illinois, a person charged with DUI faces two different cases, one before the Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV) concerning their driver’s license which requires an administrative hearing, and the actual accusation for a DUI may require a court case, traffic case, criminal case, or ticket.

Convictions for first time offenders can include heavy fines, jail sentences, DUI school, license suspension, and community service.

According to HG.org, located in Chicago,“Effective January 1, 2009, the judicial driving permit, a hardship license formerly granted to first offenders is abolished for all arrestees on or after 1-1-09. 625 ILCS 5/6-206.1 makes several substantial changes to the implied consent laws.” Whatever term you refer to drinking and driving or drunk driving,  states are clamping down on these type traffic violations.  When you face these kinds of charges, it is no time to handle your case all by yourself. We are here to help you get in contact with a lawyer who can help you understand the subtle differences in the legal jargon of Illinois law, and who specializes in representing YOUR best interests.



Ready to get Help?

Complete our Free Case Evaluation form and a DUI Lawyer will review your case for Free!










What Is Involved In A Field Sobriety Test In Colorado

After being pulled over by a a State Trooper in Denver, Colorado Springs or Aurora you might be asked to perform some basic tasks so that the law enforcement official can gauge your ability to operate your vehicle safely. The same tests could also be given by a County Sheriff’s Deputy in Lakewood, Fort Collins or Arvada. Maybe it was a  local Police Officer in Pueblo, Westminster or Boulder? If you have been questioned for suspicion of drunk driving, then hopefully you are beginning to understand that Driving Under the Influence, or DUI, (commonly called DWI, or Driving While Intoxicated, in other states) is a serious offense in Colorado.

Once you begin the Field Sobriety Test, so-named because it is done “in the field”—wherever the Officer pulls you over, the results often determine whether you continue toward your destination or whether you are detained and arrested for DUI. In court, the District Attorney will ask the arresting Officer to recount every detail of your Field Sobriety Test. It may even be recorded by a dashboard camera and played back in court. Throughout Colorado, law enforcement Officers depend on the Field Sobriety Test to measure a driver’s sobriety or lack thereof.

But wait, why did the Officer stop me in the first place?

The Colorado State Trooper, local Police Officer, or County Sheriff who pulled you over probably observed you driving erratically. Were you:

  • Weaving between lanes?
  • Operating your vehicle’s safety features incorrectly? (i.e. driving without your headlights at night or without your windshield wipers during a rainstorm)
  • Driving above or below the posted speed limit? or
  • Stopping your vehicle without proper cause or in an illegal place?

Perhaps the Officer observed nothing improper about your driving but, instead, stopped you as part of a traffic checkpoint.

After reviewing your driver’s license and vehicle registration, if the Officer suspected your ability to drive was impaired by alcohol or drugs, more than likely he directed you to exit your vehicle and take a Field Sobriety Test. This psychophysical test measures impairment by alcohol or other substances of your basic motor and cognitive skills.

Most Coloradoans have seen Field Sobriety Tests depicted in television shows or movies. Or perhaps they have experienced one first-hand. Even though most people know generally what happens in them, many states lack written instructions dictating that each Field Sobriety Test be administered in exactly the same fashion under controlled conditions.

The United States National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) created its own standards for Field Sobriety Tests, which many Officers nationwide use as a general guideline. A Field Sobriety Text administered by a Police Officer in Denver, however, can vary greatly from one administered by a County Sheriff in Fort Collins or from one administered by State Trooper in Aurora.

The Officer may administer any or all of these three tests:

  • Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN): HGN refers to the normal, uncontrollable twitching or jerking of the eyes while looking sharply to the left or right.  Everyone experiences a slight degree of HGN under normal circumstances. Under the influence of alcohol or any drug (over-the-counter, prescription or illegal), this twitching or jerking can occur even when the suspect is focused straight ahead or just slightly to one side. During the HGN test, the suspect focuses on a slow moving object (such as the Officer’s pen or finger) while the Officer watches carefully for any jerking or twitching of the eyeballs. Concerns about accuracy of the HGN test include:
    • Many law enforcement vehicles have dashboard video cameras, allowing for constant videotaping of the Officer’s interactions with the suspect. Even the best dashboard video equipment, though, cannot record the suspect’s eye movements. Therefore the Officer can only relate the results of the HGN test verbally in court.
    • Suspects must take this test in a variety of climate conditions, ranging from rain, dense fog, snow or high winds. It seems highly unlikely that the varied climate conditions would have no impact on the Officer’s ability to observe slight eye movements. And since this test is frequently administered at night, lack of good lighting presents further obstacles to a thorough, accurate assessment.
  • One-Leg Stand (OLS). During the OLS the suspect stands on one leg with the other raised six inches off the ground. While maintaining this position, the suspect counts aloud, starting at one thousand, and continue counting until told to stop (usually for thirty seconds). The Officer watches for these possible indicators of the suspect’s impairment during the OLS:
  1. Lowering the foot before the test ends;
  2. Counting out of sequence;
  3. Waving the arms for balance;
  4. Hopping to maintain balance; and
  5. Falling over during the test.

Like the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus test, the One Leg Stand has multiple factors that can interfere with an accurate assessment of sobriety

  1. What if English is not the suspect’s native language? Counting in the thousands could be impossible even when not impaired.
  2. What if the suspect is nervous around Law Enforcement Officers, for reasons not related to sobriety? This could negatively impact his ability to perform well on any such test.
  • Walk-and-Turn (WAT): During the WAT, the suspect takes nine steps, heel-to-toe, along an imaginary straight line. Then the suspect pivots 180 degrees on the ball of one foot and takes another nine steps, still heel-to-toe, in the opposite direction. During the WAT, the Officer watches for many indicators of potential alcohol and/or drug impairment, including:
  1. Excessive use of the arms for balance,
  2. Stopping before the WAT is complete,
  3. Taking more or less than nine steps,
  4. Failure to stand still and straight while as the Officer explains the WAT,
  5. Weaving instead of walking in a straight line,
  6. Walking with the feet side-by-side instead of walking heel-to-toe,
  7. Failure to pivot turn on the ball of the foot, and
  8. Starting the test before the Officer completes the instructions.

Many legitimate issues could interfere with the WAT test results, including:

    • Shoe soles Something as simple as the suspect’s shoes can significantly impact the WAT test. For instance, leather soles can be slippery and result in turning too quickly, causing a loss of balance. Conversely, rubber soles can “grip” the roadside, also causing a loss of balance. And high heels, whether on a woman’s shoe or a man’s boot, can make heel-to-toe walking difficult.
    • Medical conditions Inner ear problems or chronic leg or back pain can cause a loss of balance.  Obesity can also adversely impact balance.
    • Roadside Surface Condition Ice, rain, snow or even spilled motor oil can make the roadside surface slippery, causing challenges.

Here are some additional factors to consider about Field Sobriety Tests:

  • An Officer forms an opinion about a driver’s sobriety (or lack thereof) from the moment he first observes the driver’s vehicle, before the Officer ever decides to pull him over. While unsafe driving has no excuse, it is not always caused by alcohol and/or drug impairment. For example:
    • Focusing on a conversation, either with passengers or via a cell phone, instead of on the posted speed limits can cause a driver to speed.
    • Changing a compact disc, reading a map or engaging with children in the backseat can cause a driver to weave between lanes.

In both of these examples, the Officer may assume a driver is under the influence, even though the suspect is really guilty of driving distractedly.

  • Anything an Officer observes about a driver, while speaking with him or during the Field Sobriety Test, can be admitted in court, even though the Officer has not yet read the suspect his Miranda rights.
  • Hearing and following an Officer’s verbal instructions on the side of a noisy roadway can be difficult for Coloradoans with hearing deficits, whether due to advanced age or medical conditions.
  • Even something as simple as the driver leaning on or pulling against his car door while exiting could be construed by an Officer as evidence of impairment. But such actions could be simply the result of chronic back pain or sore muscles from a challenging workout the day before, not impairment by alcohol and/or drugs.

Although Law Enforcement Officers and District Attorneys rely heavily on Field Sobriety Tests for assessment of impairment, they are not always the most accurate measure of a driver’s sobriety. In court, though, it will be your testimony versus the arresting Officer’s. Make a smart decision today, and contact a Colorado DUI/DWAI lawyer. Your future is at risk if you have been arrested for DUI. Make sure you have a Colorado DUI lawyer on your side as a trusted guide and advisor.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]


Ready to get Help?

Complete our Free Case Evaluation form and a DUI Lawyer will review your case for Free!










Google-Translate-English to Spanish